On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:41:25PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed,  7 Apr 2010 16:29:27 -0400
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > We prefix pertient book keeping functions and variables with the
> > 'swiotlb_tbl' prefix.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/swiotlb.c |  149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> >  1 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> 
> Can we create the swiotlb initialization function instead of lots of
> renaming and exporting iotlb values?

Yes, this would definitly do it! Let me rebase my tree on top of your
patches.

Thought I was thinking to modify your patches so they have the _tbl, instead
of _tlb in their name?

quoted text
> 
> =
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] swiotlb: add the swiotlb initialization function
> with iotlb memory
> 
> This enables the caller to initialize swiotlb with its own iotlb
> memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/