Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Takuya Yoshikawa
Date: Monday, May 10, 2010 - 5:26 am

>>

Sorry but no, and I agree with your guess.
Anyway, I want to do some profiling to confirm this guess.


BTW, If we only think about performance improvement of time, optimized
get(get.opt) may be enough at this stage.

But if we consider the future expansion like using user allocated bitmaps,
new API's introduced for switch.opt won't become waste, I think, because we
need a structure to get and export bitmap addresses.



OK, I'll do!


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH 4/12] x86: introduce copy_in_user() for 32-bit, Takuya Yoshikawa, (Tue May 4, 6:02 am)
[RFC][PATCH RFC 10/12] KVM: move dirty bitmaps to user space, Takuya Yoshikawa, (Tue May 4, 6:07 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving d ..., Takuya Yoshikawa, (Mon May 10, 5:26 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH RFC 10/12] KVM: move dirty bitmaps to user ..., Takuya Yoshikawa, (Tue May 11, 11:27 pm)