Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Monday, May 10, 2010 - 4:49 am

On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 13:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

Sure, sounds like a sensible suggestion.

One thing I'd also like to clarify is that !raw events should not be
exhaustive hardware event lists, those are best left for userspace, but
instead are generally useful events that can be expected to be
implemented by any hardware of that particular class.

So a GPU might have things like 'vsync' and 'cmd_pipeline_stall' or
whatever is a generic GPU feature, but not very implementation specific
things that the next generation of hardware won't ever have.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon May 10, 4:49 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon May 10, 11:34 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon May 10, 11:35 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon May 10, 11:46 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon May 10, 11:50 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs, stephane eranian, (Tue May 11, 3:09 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs, Borislav Petkov, (Tue May 11, 7:15 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs, Borislav Petkov, (Tue May 11, 8:37 am)