Re: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/4] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Howells
Date: Friday, April 9, 2010 - 2:10 am

Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:


There's no difference between your two versions of rcu_access_pointer(), so
you could move that whole construct outside of the #ifdef'ed section.

Other than that:

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH tip/core/urgent] rcu: updates for RCU lockdep, Paul E. McKenney, (Thu Apr 8, 10:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/4] rcu: add rcu_access_pointe ..., David Howells, (Fri Apr 9, 2:10 am)
[PATCH tip/core/urgent] v2 rcu: updates for RCU lockdep, Paul E. McKenney, (Fri Apr 9, 3:38 pm)
[tip:core/urgent] rcu: Add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dere ..., tip-bot for Paul E. ..., (Wed Apr 14, 8:00 am)
[tip:core/urgent] rcu: Better explain the condition parame ..., tip-bot for David Ho ..., (Wed Apr 14, 8:01 am)
[tip:core/urgent] rcu: Update docs for rcu_access_pointer ..., tip-bot for Paul E. ..., (Wed Apr 14, 8:01 am)