Re: [PATCH v3] x86: let 'reservetop' functioning right

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010 - 8:41 pm

On 04/08/2010 08:23 PM, Liang Li wrote:

Well, the first question is "do we need the reservetop= kernel
parameter"?  Zach added it, I think, so that VMI could be loaded
dynamically as a module.  Given that VMI is deprecated anyway, I wonder
if we can just drop support for modular VMI and remove the reservetop=
kernel parameter.  Or are there other uses for it?

    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH v3] x86: let 'reservetop' functioning right, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Apr 8, 8:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3] x86: let 'reservetop' functioning right, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Apr 8, 8:41 pm)