On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:41:24PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> >From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> >
> >Revert ba168fc37dea145deeb8fa9e7e71c748d2e00d74 "memory-hotplug: add 0x prefix
> >to HEX block_size_bytes" since it changes the user space visible sysfs interface
> >/sys/devices/system/memory/block_size_bytes.
> >The change breaks existing user space applications which rely on the fact that
> >the output does not contain the "0x" prefix.
> 
> Odd.
> 
> Which application relies on this? Isn't the application which should
> be fixed?? It should use something like strtoul() which doesn't
> rely on '0x' prefix.

Ok, consider it the other way round: your application is doing strtoul()
with a base of 0 (since you rely on the 0x prefix) and for no good reason
it doesn't work on older kernels.
I really can't see a reason for adding additional pitfalls by _changing_
a long existing user space interface.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/