I was expecting you to NAK all of them anyway after I saw all the code
Not a problem. Are you planning on merging any of the dt3155 cleanup
patches? If so I will wait until they show up.
Also, should staging patches be based on linux-next or on Linus' git tree?
I wasn't on the CC list for the ones I noticed on LKML.
A lot of the patches I saw seemed to be duplicate works to clean up the
files. Plus, some of them appeared that they would conflict in various
Not a problem. I'll wait a bit to see what shows up before doing anything.
Do you know off hand what (if any) of the dt3155 patches you took and when
they might show up in linux-next? The last commits in next-20100413 are:
Author: Tejun Heo <email@example.com>
Date: Wed Mar 24 17:04:11 2010 +0900
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from p
Author: H Hartley Sweeten <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Fri Feb 26 17:58:07 2010 -0700
staging: dt3155: revert u_long to u64 usage
Hm, I need to tell Stephen to pull the proper tree for my staging-next
stuff, I am playing around with just using git for it. Give me some
time, I'm in a conference all this week...