Hi John,

On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 13:02 -0700, John W. Linville wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:50:00PM -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote:
> 
> > I attach here again in case you did not get it.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Wey
> > 
> > 
> 
> > From f3a5f691e32c0edfbc42a1e8687392dc3efe396e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
> > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:17:37 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] iwlwifi: need check for valid qos packet before free
> > 
> > For 4965, need to check it is valid qos frame before free, only valid
> > QoS frame has the tid used to free the packets.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
> 
> I would prefer to take this through the normal wireless-2.6 route if
> you don't mind.  Are you satisifed with this version?
> 

Thanks for the help, the finial version should take care of the problem
and ready for upstream .

Regards
Wey
quoted text
> 
> P.S.  In the future, I'm also quite open to revert requests as needed.
> It makes my life easier for things (even reverts) under wireless to
> come through my tree rather than trying to figure-out how something
> happened later...

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/