Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fix

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010 - 11:36 am

On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote:

No workee.

It really should round up.

If you worry about code generation, I'd suggest looking at whether 
nr_cpu_ids could just be made unsigned.

Anyway, this all was _not_ the point of my original email. I really don't 
care about this particular instance. I care more about the whole "in 
general people should think _way_ more about validating user-supplied 
arguments than clearly happened this time".

			Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[GIT PULL] scheduler fix, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 8, 8:38 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fix, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Apr 8, 8:42 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fix, Andreas Schwab, (Thu Apr 8, 9:03 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fix, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 8, 11:26 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fix, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Apr 8, 11:36 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fix, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 8, 11:52 am)