On 04/08/2010 01:28 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text >
>
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I am definitely ACK-ing. Sorry about not explicitly stating that.
>> The developer is Yinghai Lu, I am the co-maintainer of the iBFT driver.
>>
>> Linus, would you like me to modify the commit so that it has 'Acked-by:'
>> by me in the git tree?
>
> No, no, a sign-off is already an ack, and is "stronger" than an ack, since
> it actually also means that you send it onwards. A patch that you don't
> like you would obviously never sign off on either.
>
> I was more looking for comments from other people who know what the heck
> that early reservation system does.
Just for the record, it also looks good to me (the other co-maintainer), so:
Signed-Off-By: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
But obviously that doesn't actually constitute the acks you were /looking/
for.
--
Peter
What we need is either less corruption, or more chances to
participate in it.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH 1/1] ibft, x86: Change reserve_ibft_ ... , Peter Jones , (Thu Apr 8, 10:37 am)