Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Valdis.Kletnieks
Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 - 11:01 am

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:09:45 PDT, akpm@linux-foundation.org said:

Seen in dmesg, 2.6.34-rc2-mmotm0323 didn't do this. Tossing it at all the
likely suspects, hopefully somebody will recognize it and save me the
bisecting. ;)

[   11.488535] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink.
[   11.488579] 
[   11.488579] ===================================================
[   11.489529] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[   11.489988] ---------------------------------------------------
[   11.490494] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
[   11.491024] 
[   11.491024] other info that might help us debug this:
[   11.491025] 
[   11.492834] 
[   11.492835] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
[   11.494124] 1 lock held by swapper/1:
[   11.494776]  #0:  (nf_ct_ecache_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8148c606>] nf_conntrack_register_notifier+0x1a/0x76
[   11.495505] 
[   11.495506] stack backtrace:
[   11.496927] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-mmotm0405 #1
[   11.497668] Call Trace:
[   11.498419]  [<ffffffff810638c5>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb2
[   11.499185]  [<ffffffff8148c629>] nf_conntrack_register_notifier+0x3d/0x76
[   11.499967]  [<ffffffff81b5dd7b>] ctnetlink_init+0x71/0xd5
[   11.500775]  [<ffffffff81b5dd0a>] ? ctnetlink_init+0x0/0xd5
[   11.501579]  [<ffffffff810001ef>] do_one_initcall+0x59/0x14e
[   11.502396]  [<ffffffff81b3268a>] kernel_init+0x144/0x1ce
[   11.503218]  [<ffffffff81003514>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[   11.504047]  [<ffffffff8159cc00>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[   11.504882]  [<ffffffff81b32546>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1ce
[   11.505715]  [<ffffffff81003510>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
[   11.506636] ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team
[   11.507372] TCP bic registered
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded, akpm, (Mon Apr 5, 4:09 pm)
[PATCH mmotm] hid-picolcd: depends on LCD_CLASS_DEVICE, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Apr 5, 10:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH mmotm] hid-picolcd: depends on LCD_CLASS_DEVICE, Bruno =?UTF-8?B?UHLD ..., (Tue Apr 6, 1:56 am)
[No subject], Randy Dunlap, (Tue Apr 6, 8:26 am)
[No subject], Bruno , (Tue Apr 6, 9:35 am)
[No subject], Randy Dunlap, (Tue Apr 6, 9:56 am)
Re: [PATCH mmotm] hid-picolcd: depends on LCD_CLASS_DEVICE, Bruno =?UTF-8?B?UHLD ..., (Tue Apr 6, 2:04 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Wed Apr 7, 11:01 am)
Re: [PATCH mmotm] hid-picolcd: depends on LCD_CLASS_DEVICE, Bruno =?UTF-8?B?UHLD ..., (Wed Apr 7, 11:31 am)
Re: [PATCH mmotm] hid-picolcd: depends on LCD_CLASS_DEVICE, Bruno =?UTF-8?B?UHLD ..., (Wed Apr 7, 11:44 am)
Re: [PATCH mmotm] hid-picolcd: depends on LCD_CLASS_DEVICE, Bruno =?UTF-8?B?UHLD ..., (Wed Apr 7, 1:29 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded, Patrick McHardy, (Thu Apr 8, 4:41 am)
Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Thu Apr 8, 8:23 am)
Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded, Patrick McHardy, (Thu Apr 8, 8:36 am)
Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Thu Apr 8, 5:50 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded, Patrick McHardy, (Fri Apr 9, 7:49 am)
Re: [PATCH mmotm] hid-picolcd: depends on LCD_CLASS_DEVICE, Bruno Prémont, (Sun Apr 11, 3:17 am)