Re: Memory policy question for NUMA arch....

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rick Sherm
Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 - 8:48 am

Hi Andy,

--- On Wed, 4/7/10, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

Interleaving,yup that's what I thought. I've tight control on the environment.So for one driver I need high throughput and I will use the interleaving-policy.But for the other 2-3 drivers, I need low latency.So I would like to restrict it to the local node.These are just my thoughts but I'll have to experiment and see what the numbers look like. Once I've some numbers I will post them in a few weeks.

Perfect.Ok, then I'll probably write a simple user-space wrapper:
  1)set mem-policy type depending on driver-foo-M.
  2)load driver-foo-M.
  3)goto 1) and repeat for other driver[s]-foo-X
BTW - I would know before hand which adapter is placed in which slot and so I will be able to deduce its proximity to a Node.



Thanks
Rick


      
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Memory policy question for NUMA arch...., Rick Sherm, (Wed Apr 7, 8:48 am)
Re: Memory policy question for NUMA arch...., Lee Schermerhorn, (Wed Apr 7, 10:27 am)