On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 05:05:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri,  2 Apr 2010 17:02:40 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> 
> > Fragmentation index is a value that makes sense when an allocation of a
> > given size would fail. The index indicates whether an allocation failure is
> > due to a lack of memory (values towards 0) or due to external fragmentation
> > (value towards 1).  For the most part, the huge page size will be the size
> > of interest but not necessarily so it is exported on a per-order and per-zone
> > basis via /proc/extfrag_index
> 
> (/proc/sys/vm?)
> 

It can move.

quoted text
> Like unusable_index, this seems awfully specialised. 

Except in this case, the fragmentation index is used by the kernel when
deciding in advance whether compaction will do the job or if lumpy
reclaim is required.

I could avoid exposing this to userspace but it would make it harder to
decide what needs to happen with extfrag_threshold later. i.e. does the
threshold need a different value (proc would help gather the data) or
is a new heuristic needed.

quoted text
> Perhaps we could
> hide it under CONFIG_MEL, or even put it in debugfs with the intention
> of removing it in 6 or 12 months time.  Either way, it's hard to
> justify permanently adding this stuff to every kernel in the world?
> 

Moving it to debugfs would satisfy the requirement of tuning extfrag_threshold
without adding it to every kernel but it could also be just removed.

quoted text
> 
> I have a suspicion that all the info in unusable_index and
> extfrag_index could be computed from userspace using /proc/kpageflags

It can be computed from buddyinfo. I used a perl script to calculate it
in the past. I exposed the information from in-kernel in these patches so
people would be guaranteed to have the same information as me.

quoted text
> (and perhaps a bit of dmesg-diddling to find the zones). 

Can be figured out from buddyinfo too.

quoted text
> If that can't
> be done today, I bet it'd be pretty easy to arrange for it.
> 

It is. Will I just remove the proc files, keep the internal calculation
for fragmentation_index and kick that perl script into shape to produce
the same information from buddyinfo?

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/