Re: Arch specific mmap attributes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 - 2:00 am

On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 16:14 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

There are cases where the userspace based driver needs to control
attributes such as write combining, or even cachability when mapping PCI
devices directly into userspace.

It's not -that- common, though X still does it on a number of platforms,
and there are people still trying to run PCI drivers in userspace ;-) 

But regardless. I don't see why HPC or Embedded would have to be
qualified as "crap" and not warrant our full attention into devising
something sane and clean anyways.

Cheers,
Ben.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
mprotect pgprot handling weirdness, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Apr 5, 10:09 pm)
Re: mprotect pgprot handling weirdness, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Apr 5, 10:32 pm)
Re: mprotect pgprot handling weirdness, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Apr 5, 10:43 pm)
Re: mprotect pgprot handling weirdness, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Apr 5, 10:52 pm)
Arch specific mmap attributes (Was: mprotect pgprot handli ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Apr 5, 11:07 pm)
Re: Arch specific mmap attributes (Was: mprotect pgprot ha ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Apr 6, 12:30 am)
Re: Arch specific mmap attributes (Was: mprotect pgprot ha ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Apr 6, 3:15 pm)
Re: Arch specific mmap attributes, David Miller, (Wed Apr 7, 12:03 am)
Re: Arch specific mmap attributes, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Apr 7, 12:14 am)
Re: Arch specific mmap attributes, David Miller, (Wed Apr 7, 12:18 am)
Re: Arch specific mmap attributes (Was: mprotect pgprot ha ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Apr 7, 1:56 am)
Re: Arch specific mmap attributes, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Apr 7, 1:58 am)
Re: Arch specific mmap attributes, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Apr 7, 2:00 am)