From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:27:42PM -0700

quoted text
> No, you're mis-reading the asm. It's again the first iteration, and the 
> code above it is again the end of the loop. And %rax is once more a kernel 
> pointer, not the return value of 'page_referenced_one()'. 
> 
> So it once more is 'anon_vma->head.next' that is crap, but now it's not 
> NULL, it's that very odd 0x002e2e2e002e2e2e pattern (the %r13 has had 0x20 
> subtracted from it, so that LSB of "0x0e" is actually _also_ a 0x2e).

No, maybe I expressed myself wrong (it was late an' all) - I was
basically trying to confirm your assessment that anon_vma->head.next
is crap but the code had changed since I had added the debugging 'if
(!anon_vma->head.next)' and that was the value that was already in %r13
before iterating over the list chain.

Yeah, just a minor nitpick and not that it matters. Nevermind though,
we're on the same page.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/