> On Apr 6, 2010, at 10:32 PM, Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:38:16PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>>>> Cong Wang wrote:
>>>>> Before I try to reproduce it, could you please try to replace
>>>>> the 'read_lock()'
>>>>> in slaves_support_netpoll() with 'read_lock_bh()'? (read_unlock()
>>>>> too) Try if this helps.
>>>>>
>>>> Confirmed. Please use the attached patch instead, for your testing.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>> Moving those locks to bh-locks will not resolve this. I tried that
>>> yesterday and tried your new patch today without success. That
>>> warning
>>> is a WARN_ON_ONCE so you need to reboot to see that it is still a
>>> problem. Simply unloading and loading the new module is not an
>>> accurate
>>> test.
>>> Also, my system still hangs when removing the bonding module. I do
>>> not
>>> think you intended to fix this with the patch, but wanted it to be
>>> clear
>>> to everyone on the list.
>>
>> Actually I did reboot and then tested the module. I didn't get any
>> warning.
>> I just tried again today, and no warnings at all.
>>
>> For removing bonding module, you may need another fix of mine,
>> which is to fix a potential deadlock of workqueue. Try:
>>
>>
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/1/58
>>
>>> You should also configure your kernel with a some of the lock
>>> debugging
>>> enabled. I've been using the following:
>>> CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK=y
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
>>> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
>>> CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y
>>> CONFIG_LOCK_STAT=y
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y
>>
>> Sure, I always keep these.
>>
>>> Here is the output when I remove a slave from the bond. My
>>> xmit_roundrobin patch from earlier (replacing read_lock with
>>> read_trylock) was applied. It might be helpful for you when
>>> debugging
>>> these issues.
>>
>> I don't apply your patch, just tested my patch.
>>
>>> Dead loop on virtual device bond0, fix it urgently!
>> Please provide your bonding configuration and steps to reproduce it.
>>
>
> My first response in this thread provides the commands and
> configuration needed to reproduce this.