Re: Downsides to madvise/fadvise(willneed) for application startup

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Taras Glek
Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2010 - 3:09 pm

On 04/05/2010 04:52 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
Yes. There were some stones left unturned in the cold startup area. 
Turns out that every single large application suffers from low io 
throughput likely due to lack of cooperation between the dynamic linker 
and the kernel.
There is a glibc bug filed on that.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11431

Unfortunately, few userspace people seem to know exactly how madvise() 
hints behave, so I was hoping someone on LKML would clue me in.

Taras
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Downsides to madvise/fadvise(willneed) for application ..., Taras Glek, (Tue Apr 6, 3:09 pm)