On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:55:03PM +0200, ext Nishanth Menon wrote:
quoted text
>some reasons why i love switch statements ;) since I dont expect other
>than precisely 4 and 8 (do we expect 5,6,7 - i might be wrong).. but if
>it is so, wont the following be better?
>
>switch (mmc_slot(host).wires)
>{
>case 8:
>	mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
>	/* fall thru*/
>case 4:
>	mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>		break;
>default:
>	WARN("bad width");
>}

I like that, but I remember Madhu (or someone else) saying he thinks 
it's less readable this way. Go figure...

-- 
balbi
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/