On 4/5/2010 8:14, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
quoted text > So the main issue is that for many workloads, it is best to run full bore
> and get done quickly, thus allowing the entire machine to be powered down?
yep
quoted text >
> If so, it seems likely that there would be some workloads that were sometimes
> unable to use all the CPUs, in which case shutting down (idling, offlining,
> dyntick-idling, whatever) the excess CPUs might nevertheless be the right
> thing to do.
but the point is that the normal scheduler + idle behavior gives you exactly that
in a natural way !
If you don't have enough work (tasks) to keep all cores busy, the others are and stay idle.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: A few questions and issues with dynticks, NOHZ and pow ... , Arjan van de Ven , (Mon Apr 5, 9:07 am)