Hey,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 04:53:26PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
as a sidenote: if we know -- like here -- that the next IRQ will be issued
soon, in approximately 1.75 ms (well, at least on my system), might it make
sense to make tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() smarter to know about this?
Best,
Dominik
--