Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Friday, April 30, 2010 - 3:13 pm

On Friday 30 April 2010, mark gross wrote:

Well, I'd take it to suspend-2.6/linux-next, but first, it touches
subsystems whose maintainers were not in the Cc list, like the network
drivers, wireless and ACPI.  The changes are trivial, so I hope they don't
mind.

Second, my tree is based on the Linus' tree rather than linux-next and
the change in net/mac80211/scan.c doesn't seem to match that.  Please tell me
what I'm supposed to do about that.

Thanks,
Rafael

 

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, mark gross, (Fri Apr 30, 2:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 30, 3:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, mark gross, (Fri Apr 30, 4:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 30, 4:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Jonathan Corbet, (Mon May 3, 9:33 am)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Kevin Hilman, (Mon May 3, 9:40 am)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Jonathan Corbet, (Mon May 3, 9:42 am)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Kevin Hilman, (Mon May 3, 10:01 am)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Jonathan Corbet, (Mon May 3, 10:10 am)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Matthew Garrett, (Mon May 3, 2:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Pavel Machek, (Mon May 3, 9:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, mark gross, (Tue May 4, 7:30 am)
Re: [PATCH]PM QOS refresh against next-20100430, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 5, 4:59 pm)