Re: linux-next: Tree for April 30 (CONFIG_SYSFS=n)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Friday, April 30, 2010 - 10:50 am

On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:35:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:



When CONFIG_SYSFS is disabled:

include/linux/sysfs.h:330: error: parameter 1 ('type') has incomplete type

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for April 30, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu Apr 29, 11:35 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 30 (CONFIG_SYSFS=n), Randy Dunlap, (Fri Apr 30, 10:50 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 30, Frederic Weisbecker, (Fri Apr 30, 12:27 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 30, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon May 3, 12:29 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 30 (CONFIG_SYSFS=n), Randy Dunlap, (Wed May 5, 9:17 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 30 (CONFIG_SYSFS=n), Eric W. Biederman, (Wed May 5, 2:35 pm)