Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2010 » April » 29

Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Alex Elsayed
Subject: Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 - 9:28 pm

Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock <at> gmail.com> writes:


Uh oh. 2.6.33 compiled with this config (taking all defaults for make oldconfig)
doesn't boot either. Totally lost now.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def, Alex Elsayed, (Wed Apr 28, 7:28 pm)
Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def, Justin P. Mattock, (Wed Apr 28, 7:52 pm)
Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def, Alex Elsayed, (Wed Apr 28, 8:05 pm)
Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def, Justin P. Mattock, (Wed Apr 28, 8:12 pm)
Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def, Alex Elsayed, (Wed Apr 28, 9:28 pm)
Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def, Alex Elsayed, (Wed Apr 28, 9:36 pm)
Re: Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def, Alex Elsayed, (Wed Apr 28, 9:50 pm)