Re: ath5k misbehaving affecting other kernel parts unrelated?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pedro Francisco
Date: Thursday, April 29, 2010 - 3:25 am

A Quinta, 29 de Abril de 2010 08:17:00 Vegard Nossum escreveu:

It was "CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER" which was on; incidently, such dependency 
doesn't appear in the "Depends on" line, had to do a web search.

Will post the results tomorrow, unless there aren't any.

-- 
Pedro
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
ath5k misbehaving affecting other kernel parts unrelated?, Pedro Francisco, (Fri Apr 23, 12:06 am)
Re: ath5k misbehaving affecting other kernel parts unrelated?, John W. Linville, (Fri Apr 23, 6:48 am)
Re: ath5k misbehaving affecting other kernel parts unrelated?, Maciej Żenczykowski, (Fri Apr 23, 9:43 am)
Re: ath5k misbehaving affecting other kernel parts unrelated?, Pedro Francisco, (Sat Apr 24, 10:28 am)
Re: ath5k misbehaving affecting other kernel parts unrelated?, Pedro Francisco, (Thu Apr 29, 3:25 am)