On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:12:44 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:04:06 -0500
> Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> 
> > > I suspect random32() would suffice here.  It avoids depleting the
> > > entropy pool altogether.
> > 
> > I wouldn't worry about that. get_random_int() touches the urandom pool,
> > which will always leave entropy around. Also, Ted and I decided over a
> > year ago that we should drop the whole entropy accounting framework,
> > which I'll get around to some rainy weekend.
> 
> hm, so why does random32() exist?  Speed?

Because I need a cheap fast pseudo-random source for emulation
and it got used for more and more non-cryptographic uses.
And like most random generators people keep forgetting that
it was not intended for security use.

-- 
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/