On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 01:47:19PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
quoted text
>  static inline void anon_vma_unlock(struct vm_area_struct *vma)

never mind as this is RFC, lock is clear enough

quoted text
> @@ -1762,7 +1760,8 @@ static int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
>  
> -	anon_vma_lock(vma);
> +	spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> +	anon_vma_lock(vma, &mm->page_table_lock);

This will cause a lock inversion (page_table_lock can only be taken
after the anon_vma lock). I don't immediately see why the
page_table_lock here though?
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/