On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 07:24:13PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
quoted text
> On 04/28/2010 06:55 PM, Jiri Benc wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:20:56 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> Can you try reverting commit c8d52465f95c4187871f8e65666c07806ca06d41 and see if
> >> it helps ?
> > 
> > It doesn't. The produced code is identical.
> > 
> >> If you have other compiler versions handy, that would also be helpful to see if
> >> the problem is specific to the gcc version you are using.
> > 
> > Tried 4.5.0, the same problem (at least looking at the produced assembler
> > code, I haven't booted the kernel, but it looks very similar to 4.3.3).
> 
> I wrote on the bugzilla but this is not a compiler bug but the -stable
> patch shouldn't have been applied only to 2.6.33.  Not 2.6.32.  This
> is because till 2.6.32, ia64 hadn't been converted to dynamic percpu
> allocator, so its static and dynamic percpu areas were separate and
> the per_cpu_ptr() wouldn't do the offsetting the module code expects
> there.  So, please revert the patch from 2.6.32.

Ah crap, I missed that.  I'll go revert it from .32 now, sorry about
that.

greg k-h
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/