On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:30:52 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:

quoted text
> During exec(), a temporary stack is setup and moved later to its final
> location. There is a race between migration and exec whereby a migration
> PTE can be placed in the temporary stack. When this VMA is moved under the
> lock, migration no longer knows where the PTE is, fails to remove the PTE
> and the migration PTE gets copied to the new location.  This later causes
> a bug when the migration PTE is discovered but the page is not locked.
> 
> This patch handles the situation by removing the migration PTE when page
> tables are being moved in case migration fails to find them. The alternative
> would require significant modification to vma_adjust() and the locks taken
> to ensure a VMA move and page table copy is atomic with respect to migration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

Mel, I don't like this fix. Consider following,

 1. try_to_unmap(oldpage)
 2. copy and replace
 3. remove_migration_ptes(oldpage, newpage)

What this patch handles is "3: remove_migration_ptes fails to remap it and
migration_pte will remain there case....The fact "new page is not mapped" means
"get_page() is not called against the new page".
So, the new page have been able to be freed until we restart move_ptes.

I bet calling __get_user_pages_fast() before vma_adjust() is the way to go. 
When page_count(page) != page_mapcount(page) +1, migration skip it.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/