Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2010 » April » 26

Re: parport_pc.c and parport_serial.c need improvements

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Alan Cox
Subject: Re: parport_pc.c and parport_serial.c need improvements
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010 - 3:10 pm

> parport_pc, similar to parport_serial. In any case, it would be nice

I think the superIO code is more 'evolved' than 'designed'. It's
something people nailed bits onto in passing rather than structured
elegantly.

Do what you think is right IMHO.

Alan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
parport_pc.c and parport_serial.c need improvements, Joseph Krahn, (Fri Apr 23, 9:33 am)
Re: parport_pc.c and parport_serial.c need improvements, Alan Cox, (Mon Apr 26, 3:10 pm)