Re: Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mm: make working set portion that is protected tunable v2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christian Ehrhardt
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010 - 5:43 am

KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

Not a problem, atm I'm happy about any review and comment :-)


Briefly - We had discussed non desktop scenarios where like a day load 
that builds up the working set to 50% and a nightly backup job which 
then is unable to use that protected 50% when sequentially reading a lot 
of disks and due to that doesn't finish before morning.

The knob should help those people that know their system would suffer 
from this or similar cases to e.g. set the protected ratio smaller or 
even to zero if wanted.

As mentioned before, being able to gain back those protected 50% would 
be even better - if it can be done in a way not hurting the original 
intention of protecting them.

I personally just don't feel too good knowing that 50% of my memory 
might hang around unused for many hours while they could be of some use.
I absolutely agree with the old intention and see how the patch helped 
with the latency issue Elladan brought up in the past - but it just 
looks way too aggressive to protect it "forever" for some server use cases.


The discussion ends at http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/22/38 - feel free to 
click through it.

-- 

Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, System z Linux Performance
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Tue Mar 23, 7:35 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Mon Apr 19, 5:22 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Tue Apr 20, 12:20 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Tue Apr 20, 1:54 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Tue Apr 20, 9:23 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Wed Apr 21, 12:35 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Wed Apr 21, 11:21 pm)
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mm: make working set portion that is ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Mon Apr 26, 3:59 am)
Re: Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mm: make working set portion tha ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Mon Apr 26, 5:43 am)
Re: Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mm: make working set portion tha ..., Christian Ehrhardt, (Tue Apr 27, 7:00 am)