Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Avi Kivity
Date: Saturday, April 24, 2010 - 11:25 am

On 04/23/2010 07:26 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:

The guest isn't required to do any put_page()s.  It can issue lots of 
them when memory is available, and keep them in the hypervisor forever.  
Failing new put_page()s isn't enough for a dynamic system, you need to 
be able to force the guest to give up some of its tmem.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Dan Magenheimer, (Thu Apr 22, 6:42 am)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Avi Kivity, (Sat Apr 24, 11:25 am)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Apr 26, 5:49 pm)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Apr 30, 10:52 am)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Apr 30, 11:59 am)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Martin Schwidefsky, (Mon May 10, 9:05 am)