On Apr 24, 2010, at 11:02 AM, Greg KH wrote:
quoted text >>
>>> Apparently Greg's scripts modify the
>>> changelogs respectively when he cherry-picks from linux-2.6.git, so the
>>> requirement is also always fulfilled with this alternative submission path.
>
> No, it's not a real submission patch, and yes, I always require a git
> commit id in the patch. If I don't have it, it is explained in the
> patch why it is not in Linus's tree.
>
> Don't worry, I think the current wording is fine.
Thanks for clarifying, I didn't realize the wording was referring to the cc: stable@ path, where the stable team adds the commit id reference themselves once it's available.
-- Ted
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: -stable rules: upstream com ... , Theodore Tso , (Sat Apr 24, 9:50 am)