On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:24 +0200, John Kacur wrote:
>> direct dependencies:                  8752 [max: 16384]
>> I have
>> stack-trace invocations: 10888
>> from the same run.
>>
>> Still trying to figure out what the meaning is of that though to be
>> honest.
>>
>> Here is a portion of the lockdep_stats, with all of the new fields and the
>> redundant ones.
>>
>> stack-trace invocations: 10888
>>         LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ: 15
>>         LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ: 0
>>         LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ: 543
>>         LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ: 28
>>         LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ: 0
>>         LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ: 0
>>         LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ: 543
>>         LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ: 28
>>         LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS: 5
>>         LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ: 0
>>         LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS: 95
>>         LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ: 8
>>         LOCK_USED: 871
>
> 8752+871+8+95+5+28+543+28+543+15=10888
>
> So you get a stack-trace for each direct-dependency, and you get a
> stack-trace for each LOCK_state, the sum seems to match the total
> invocations.
>
> Non of these numbers look strange..
>

As I told Peter privately the laptop that triggered the
MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES every time, has met an
unfortunate early demise. However, I think it was the config - not the
hardware. On this machine where the above
numbers come from, I believe I have less debug options configured -
but it is running the exact same kernel as
the laptop was. (2.6.33.2-rt13)
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/