Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010 - 3:07 pm

Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com> writes:


Have you tried loading a 64bit vmlinux directly into a higher address
range?  There may be a bit or two missing but you should be able to
load a linux kernel above 4GB.  I tested the basics of that mechanism
when I made the 64bit relocatable kernel.

I don't buy the argument that there is a direct connection between
the amount of memory you have and how much memory it takes to dump it.
Even an indirect connections seems suspicious.

Eric
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel, Vitaly Mayatskikh, (Thu Apr 22, 9:23 am)
[PATCH 1/5] Introduce second memory resource for crash kernel, Vitaly Mayatskikh, (Thu Apr 22, 9:23 am)
[PATCH 2/5] Modify parse_crashkernel* for new syntax, Vitaly Mayatskikh, (Thu Apr 22, 9:23 am)
[PATCH 3/5] Support second memory region in crash_shrink_m ..., Vitaly Mayatskikh, (Thu Apr 22, 9:23 am)
[PATCH 4/5] x86: use second memory region for dump-capture ..., Vitaly Mayatskikh, (Thu Apr 22, 9:23 am)
[PATCH 5/5] kexec: update documentation, Vitaly Mayatskikh, (Thu Apr 22, 9:23 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Apr 22, 3:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Apr 22, 3:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Apr 22, 5:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Apr 22, 10:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel, Vitaly Mayatskikh, (Thu Apr 22, 11:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel, Vitaly Mayatskikh, (Fri Apr 23, 12:08 am)