On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Francis Galiegue wrote:
quoted text > >> This patch only fixes quite a common mistake in Documentation/, and if I
> >> scripts/get_maintainer.pl on the patch (which is recommended), I potentially
> >> mail thousands of people who probably have more useful/exciting stuff to do
> >> anyway. So, I submit it as is.
> >
> > this kind of stuff usually goes through the trivial tree. look at
> > TRIVIAL PATCHES in the MAINTAINERS file.
> > -mike
> >
>
> Point taken... But the patch doesn't apply as is over trivial/master or
> trivial/for-next, as two files don't seem to exist on either branch (trivial
> being the git repository mentioned in MAINTAINERS):
> Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt and Documentation/filesystems/ceph.txt.
That's not a problem, I pull Linus' tree into my tree when needed. Just
resend the patch (based on Linus' tree) to
trivial@kernel.org and I'll
process it appropriately.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Should I really bother all maintainers with this? , Jiri Kosina , (Thu Apr 22, 2:57 pm)