RE: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dan Magenheimer
Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010 - 8:48 am

> > a synchronous concurrency-safe page-oriented pseudo-RAM device (such

Thanks for the comment!

Synchronous is required, but likely could be simulated by ensuring all
coherency (and concurrency) requirements are met by some intermediate
"buffering driver" -- at the cost of an extra page copy into a buffer
and overhead of tracking the handles (poolid/inode/index) of pages in
the buffer that are "in flight".  This is an approach we are considering
to implement an SSD backend, but hasn't been tested yet so, ahem, the
proof will be in the put'ing. ;-)

Dan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RE: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Dan Magenheimer, (Thu Apr 22, 8:48 am)
Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Apr 27, 4:52 am)