Re: [PATCH 2/2] ibft: For UEFI machines actually do scan ACPI for iBFT.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mike Christie
Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 - 2:37 pm

On 04/21/2010 04:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:

I did a small fix to 
ibft-update-ibft-handling-for-v103-of-the-spec.patch to get it to 
compile. It looks like that patch has a "Reviewed-by: Mike Christie 
<michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>". Feel free to change that to a Signed-off-by: 
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> if needed.

I did not do any changes to 
ibft-for-uefi-machines-actually-do-scan-acpi-for-ibft.patch.

I tested both patches.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Update iBFT to 1.03, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Fri Apr 9, 7:21 am)
[PATCH 1/2] ibft: Update iBFT handling for v1.03 of the spec., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Fri Apr 9, 7:21 am)
[PATCH 2/2] ibft: For UEFI machines actually do scan ACPI ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Fri Apr 9, 7:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] ibft: For UEFI machines actually do scan A ..., Mike Christie, (Wed Apr 21, 2:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ibft: Update iBFT handling for v1.03 of th ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Tue May 11, 10:58 am)
Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ibft: Update iBFT handling for ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Wed May 12, 6:58 am)
Re: [PATCH] ibft: Use IBFT_SIGN instead of open-coding the ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Wed May 12, 7:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] ibft: Use IBFT_SIGN instead of open-coding the ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Thu May 27, 10:59 am)