RE: [PATCHv6 2.6.34-rc5 2/5] mx5: Add USB device definitions for Freescale MX51 Babbage HW

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nguyen Dinh-R00091
Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 - 8:10 am

Hi Daniel,

Functionally, this series of 5-patches for USB is dependent on this
commit:

Acked-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@canonical.com>

Amit said "I'll include this in the mx5 tree to push to Sascha."

Dinh

 

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Mack
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 7:23 PM
To: Nguyen Dinh-R00091
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux@arm.linux.org.uk; s.hauer@pengutronix.de;
valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch; grant.likely@secretlab.ca;
bryan.wu@canonical.com; amit.kucheria@canonical.com; Li Jun-R65092;
Zhang Lily-R58066
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 2.6.34-rc5 2/5] mx5: Add USB device definitions
for Freescale MX51 Babbage HW

Hi Dinh,

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:19:24PM -0500, Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com
wrote:


Hmm, this one still doesn't apply for me. Can you double-check with a
fresh checkout of 2.6.34-rc5 please?

Other than that, I'm ok with the patches now. Sascha, do you have more
objections? I couldn't test the whole thing as I lack mx5 hardware, but
it looks sane now, and it doesn't break anything for mx3.


For the patches 3/5 and 4/5 of this series, you can have my

Reviewed-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>

Thanks,
Daniel

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MXC_CCM_CCGRx_CG10_OFFSET,


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RE: [PATCHv6 2.6.34-rc5 2/5] mx5: Add USB device definitio ..., Nguyen Dinh-R00091, (Wed Apr 21, 8:10 am)