Re: [RFC] perf_events: support for uncore a.k.a. nest units

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 - 7:22 am

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 22:12 +0000, Lin Ming wrote:

If you let commit_txn() also clear the state you can save some logic and
a method.

But yes, this looks good. If you don't remove the weak interface just
yet, you can do a patch per architecture that uses this (at least
powerpc and sparc do), and remove the weak thing at the end once all
users are gone.



--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] perf_events: support for uncore a.k.a. nest units, stephane eranian, (Wed Apr 21, 1:32 am)
Re: [RFC] perf_events: support for uncore a.k.a. nest units, stephane eranian, (Wed Apr 21, 1:44 am)
Re: [RFC] perf_events: support for uncore a.k.a. nest units, Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Apr 21, 7:22 am)