>-----Original Message-----
>From:
linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
>[mailto:linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alex Chiang
>Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 10:00 AM
>To: Matthew Garrett
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
>lenb@kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Fall back to manually changing SCI_EN
>
>* Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>:
>> The ACPI spec tells us that the ACPI SCI_EN bit is under hardware
>> control and shouldn't be touched by the OS. It seems that
>the Leading
>> Other OS ignores this and some machines expect this
>behaviour. We have
>> a blacklist for these, but given that we're able to detect
>the failure
>> case and the alternative to breaking the spec is letting the machine
>> crash and burn, let's try falling back when we know the
>alternative is
>> a mostly-dead machine.
>
>Yes, we got a hint from a Lenovo BIOS developer:
>
> A SCI_EN bit had not been set at S3 resume post. It
> should be set as ACPI defines. It seems that Windows OS
> sets SCI_EN bit by itself after S3 resume....
>
>So I believe that Matthew's approach is reasonably safe and correct.
>
>Acked-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@canonical.com>
>
>/ac
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>linux-acpi" in the body of a message to
>majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
>http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>--