On 2 Apr 2010, David Miller verbalised:
quoted text >> but it does not explain *why* changing the MTU is suddenly so bad,
>> when it's worked forever before now without flaw, with no sign of
>> any sort of corruption. Why should we be confined to non-jumbo
>> frames? What are the effects if we do change MTU?
>
> Have a look at CVE-2009-4537
>
> It's a remotely exploitable memory corruptor and potential
> root hole.
That's what I thought, *if* the attackers can inject crafted Ethernet
frames onto your local network. (i.e., they need a crafted Ethernet
frame, not just crafted packet contents.)
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: unhelpful and somewhat scary r8169 boot message in 2.6 ... , Nix , (Fri Apr 2, 3:03 pm)