On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:47:14AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 05:25:10PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > The new nmi_watchdog (which uses the perf event subsystem) is very
> > similar in structure to the softlockup detector.  Using Ingo's suggestion,
> > I combined the two functionalities into one file, kernel/watchdog.c.
> > 
> > Now both the nmi_watchdog (or hardlockup detector) and softlockup detector
> > sit on top of the perf event subsystem, which is run every 60 seconds or so
> > to see if there are any lockups.

Hello all,

After making a bunch of cleanups, I am stuck debating whether to continue
updating this patch on the stale branch perf/nmi on Ingo's tree or just
repost the whole patch again (which isn't much bigger just adds the
arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c piece).

Part of the new patch series includes removing kernel/nmi_watchdog.c,
which seemed kinda silly because it was only an intermediate file until
things got shifted to kernel/watchdog.c

Thoughts?

Cheers,
Don
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/