> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 05:49, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Are you referring to my previous patch by saying "then they get tweaked
to support a semi-dynamic state"? Those were just a proposal which was never
accepted and suggested to remove those tags all together.
Yes, I agree. That's why in the first version I proposed the __usb_init,
__usb_exit, etc. tags which could be customized prior to including
composite related files.
I would still go with that solution but it was considered, let me
find the exact phrase, "Ick ick ick." :)
What's more, I don't see any other (that is cleaner) solution which
would allow flexibility so it seems what we can either choose
a non-flexible solution proposed by this patch or an ugly solution
proposed by my previous patch.
So basically, I trusted more experienced kernel developer's opinion
on this one.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +---[mina86@mina86.com]---[mina86@jabber.org]---ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--