Hmm. I tested this patch with my favourite non-scientific desktop load
test: do web browsing while doing a kernel compile with "make -j16" (after
doing a "git clean -dqfx" and "ccache -C" to get rid of old object files
and ccache).
This is on a dual-core (with SMT, so 4 threads) Core i5, so "make -j16"
overcommits the CPU's quite a bit.
And quite frankly, I think your patch makes things much worse. I don't
have numbers, but it felt much choppier and slower to do scrolling in
firefox o moving windows around while the load average is 20+.
My testload is in no way objective, nor necessarily any good, but it's the
one I happen to use, and while it's subjective, I think the difference was
pretty clear and not good.
Linus
--