Re: [PATCH] vmscan: page_check_references() check low order lumpy reclaim properly

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Friday, April 16, 2010 - 2:18 pm

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:16:18 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:


Needs a comment explaining its role, please.  Something like "direct
this reclaim run to perform lumpy reclaim"?

A clearer name might be "lumpy_relcaim_mode"?

Making it a `bool' would clarify things too.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
32GB SSD on USB1.1 P3/700 == ___HELL___ (2.6.34-rc3), Andreas Mohr, (Sun Apr 4, 3:13 pm)
Re: 32GB SSD on USB1.1 P3/700 == ___HELL___ (2.6.34-rc3), =?iso-8859-1?B?R+Fib ..., (Sun Apr 4, 4:31 pm)
Re: 32GB SSD on USB1.1 P3/700 == ___HELL___ (2.6.34-rc3), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Apr 14, 8:31 pm)
Re: 32GB SSD on USB1.1 P3/700 == ___HELL___ (2.6.34-rc3), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Apr 14, 9:32 pm)
Re: 32GB SSD on USB1.1 P3/700 == ___HELL___ (2.6.34-rc3), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Apr 14, 9:55 pm)
Re: 32GB SSD on USB1.1 P3/700 == ___HELL___ (2.6.34-rc3), Wu Fengguang, (Wed Apr 14, 10:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vmscan: page_check_references() check low orde ..., Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 16, 2:18 pm)