[PATCH] mfd: Fix fencepost error in reg cache access check

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Phil Carmody
Date: Friday, April 16, 2010 - 5:00 am

From: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com>

Accessing num_reg elements in the interval [reg .. reg+num_regs)
is permitted if (reg+numregs <= array size), so barf when that
excluded upper bound is > array size. The prior -1 would give
access to one too many elements.

Signed-off-by: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/wm8400-core.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm8400-core.c b/drivers/mfd/wm8400-core.c
index 865ce01..e08aafa 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm8400-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm8400-core.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int wm8400_read(struct wm8400 *wm8400, u8 reg, int num_regs, u16 *dest)
 {
 	int i, ret = 0;
 
-	BUG_ON(reg + num_regs - 1 > ARRAY_SIZE(wm8400->reg_cache));
+	BUG_ON(reg + num_regs > ARRAY_SIZE(wm8400->reg_cache));
 
 	/* If there are any volatile reads then read back the entire block */
 	for (i = reg; i < reg + num_regs; i++)
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int wm8400_write(struct wm8400 *wm8400, u8 reg, int num_regs,
 {
 	int ret, i;
 
-	BUG_ON(reg + num_regs - 1 > ARRAY_SIZE(wm8400->reg_cache));
+	BUG_ON(reg + num_regs > ARRAY_SIZE(wm8400->reg_cache));
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_regs; i++) {
 		BUG_ON(!reg_data[reg + i].writable);
-- 
1.6.0.4

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] mfd: Fix fencepost error in reg cache access check, Phil Carmody, (Fri Apr 16, 5:00 am)