Re: another cleanup patch gone wrong

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010 - 8:01 pm

From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:34:24 +1000 (EST)


It gets expanded internally into all of the pr_*() calls.


This is exactly how it can be used, and there is much
precedent for this now.


It was an unspecified printk() so Joe's conversion is equal
and that's a good way for him to have made these changes.

If we want to mark this as KERN_ERR or whatever, that's entirely
a seperate change.

I think your objections to Joe's changes are completely uncalled
for and his changes were good ones.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
another cleanup patch gone wrong, Finn Thain, (Thu Apr 15, 7:34 pm)
Re: another cleanup patch gone wrong, David Miller, (Thu Apr 15, 8:01 pm)
Re: another cleanup patch gone wrong, Joe Perches, (Thu Apr 15, 8:11 pm)
Re: another cleanup patch gone wrong, Finn Thain, (Thu Apr 15, 8:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] mac8390: change an error return code and some ..., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Mon May 31, 2:58 am)
[PATCH 2/2] mac8390: raise error logging priority, Finn Thain, (Tue Jun 1, 5:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mac8390: raise error logging priority, David Miller, (Wed Jun 2, 7:06 am)