Re: Low-Level and Long-Term Battery Control

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Rees
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010 - 4:42 pm

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

I do recall that some older ThinkPads had a utility that would let you
determine what "empty" and "full" was by setting artificial limits.
It's well known that by keeping batteries from being fully
charged/discharged can significantly extend it's useful life although
you will suffer from shorter run-times.  How sensitive a battery is to
this depends on it's exact chemistry, but all are affected by this to
some degree.

For example, by keeping your battery from charging above 85% and below
15% can increase the number of charge/discharge cycles a large amount
often on the order of 5-10 times more charge/discharge cycles - much
more than the 30% reduction in total capacity.  Limiting to 25-75%
will help even more.

-Dave
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Low-Level and Long-Term Battery Control, Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar, (Mon Apr 12, 6:28 am)
Re: Low-Level and Long-Term Battery Control, Pavel Machek, (Thu Apr 15, 11:02 am)
Re: Low-Level and Long-Term Battery Control, David Rees, (Thu Apr 15, 4:42 pm)
Re: Low-Level and Long-Term Battery Control, Pavel Machek, (Thu Apr 15, 9:15 pm)
Re: Low-Level and Long-Term Battery Control, Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar, (Thu Apr 22, 2:25 am)