[PATCH 02/35] VFS: Add read-only users count to superblock

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Valerie Aurora
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010 - 4:04 pm

While we can check if a file system is currently read-only, we can't
guarantee that it will stay read-only.  The file system can be
remounted read-write at any time; it's also conceivable that a file
system can be mounted a second time and converted to read-write if the
underlying fs allows it.  This is a problem for union mounts, which
require the underlying file system be read-only.  Add a read-only
users count and don't allow remounts to change the file system to
read-write or read-write mounts if there are any read-only users.

Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/namespace.c     |   11 +++++++++++
 fs/super.c         |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/fs.h |    8 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 1cd59a0..9a40282 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -200,6 +200,17 @@ int __mnt_is_readonly(struct vfsmount *mnt)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mnt_is_readonly);
 
+static void inc_hard_readonly_users(struct vfsmount *mnt)
+{
+	mnt->mnt_sb->s_hard_readonly_users++;
+}
+
+static void dec_hard_readonly_users(struct vfsmount *mnt)
+{
+	BUG_ON(mnt->mnt_sb->s_hard_readonly_users == 0);
+	mnt->mnt_sb->s_hard_readonly_users--;
+}
+
 static inline void inc_mnt_writers(struct vfsmount *mnt)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index f35ac60..fa9b40b 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ out:
  */
 static inline void destroy_super(struct super_block *s)
 {
+	BUG_ON(s->s_hard_readonly_users);
 	security_sb_free(s);
 	kfree(s->s_subtype);
 	kfree(s->s_options);
@@ -556,6 +557,21 @@ out:
 	return err;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Some uses of file systems require that they never be mounted
+ * read-write anywhere (e.g., the lower layers of union mounts must
+ * always be read-only).  If there are any of these "hard" read-only
+ * mounts, don't permit a transition to read-write.
+ *
+ * Must be called while holding the namespace lock.
+ */
+
+int sb_is_hard_readonly(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	return sb->s_hard_readonly_users ? 1 : 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sb_is_hard_readonly);
+
 /**
  *	do_remount_sb - asks filesystem to change mount options.
  *	@sb:	superblock in question
@@ -598,6 +614,9 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
 			return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
+	if (remount_rw && sb_is_hard_readonly(sb))
+		return -EROFS;
+
 	if (sb->s_op->remount_fs) {
 		retval = sb->s_op->remount_fs(sb, &flags, data);
 		if (retval)
@@ -969,6 +988,10 @@ vfs_kern_mount(struct file_system_type *type, int flags, const char *name, void
 	WARN((mnt->mnt_sb->s_maxbytes < 0), "%s set sb->s_maxbytes to "
 		"negative value (%lld)\n", type->name, mnt->mnt_sb->s_maxbytes);
 
+	error = -EROFS;
+	if (!(flags & MS_RDONLY) && sb_is_hard_readonly(mnt->mnt_sb))
+		goto out_sb;
+
 	mnt->mnt_mountpoint = mnt->mnt_root;
 	mnt->mnt_parent = mnt;
 	up_write(&mnt->mnt_sb->s_umount);
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 10b8ded..234ebc2 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1383,6 +1383,13 @@ struct super_block {
 	 * generic_show_options()
 	 */
 	char *s_options;
+
+	/*
+	 * Some mounts require that the underlying file system never
+	 * transition to read-write.  They mark the sb itself as
+	 * read-only.
+	 */
+	int s_hard_readonly_users;
 };
 
 extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb);
@@ -1767,6 +1774,7 @@ extern int get_sb_nodev(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
 	int (*fill_super)(struct super_block *, void *, int),
 	struct vfsmount *mnt);
 void generic_shutdown_super(struct super_block *sb);
+int sb_is_hard_readonly(struct super_block *sb);
 void kill_block_super(struct super_block *sb);
 void kill_anon_super(struct super_block *sb);
 void kill_litter_super(struct super_block *sb);
-- 
1.6.3.3

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 00/35] Union mounts - everything but the xattrs, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 01/35] VFS: Make lookup_hash() return a struct path, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 02/35] VFS: Add read-only users count to superblock, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 08/35] whiteout: tmpfs whiteout support, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 10/35] whiteout: ext2 whiteout support, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 11/35] whiteout: jffs2 whiteout support, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 12/35] fallthru: Basic fallthru definitions, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 14/35] fallthru: jffs2 fallthru support, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 15/35] fallthru: tmpfs fallthru support, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 20/35] union-mount: Implement union lookup, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 26/35] union-mount: In-kernel copyup routines, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 28/35] union-mount: Implement union-aware link(), Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 29/35] union-mount: Implement union-aware rename(), Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 31/35] union-mount: Implement union-aware chown(), Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
[PATCH 34/35] union-mount: Implement union-aware lchown(), Valerie Aurora, (Thu Apr 15, 4:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, David Woodhouse, (Mon Apr 19, 6:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 11/35] whiteout: jffs2 whiteout support, David Woodhouse, (Mon Apr 19, 6:03 am)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Jan Blunck, (Mon Apr 19, 6:23 am)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Jan Blunck, (Mon Apr 19, 7:12 am)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Valerie Aurora, (Mon Apr 19, 7:23 am)
Re: [PATCH 11/35] whiteout: jffs2 whiteout support, Valerie Aurora, (Mon Apr 19, 7:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Jan Blunck, (Wed Apr 21, 1:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Jamie Lokier, (Wed Apr 21, 2:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Jamie Lokier, (Wed Apr 21, 2:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Apr 21, 3:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Jamie Lokier, (Wed Apr 21, 10:36 am)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Valerie Aurora, (Wed Apr 21, 2:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, Jamie Lokier, (Wed Apr 21, 3:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH 00/35] Union mounts - everything but the xattrs, Valerie Aurora, (Wed Apr 21, 4:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support, J. R. Okajima, (Thu Apr 22, 3:30 am)