On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 09:25:03PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
quoted text
> - calculate zapped page number properly in mmu_zap_unsync_children()
> - calculate freeed page number properly kvm_mmu_change_mmu_pages()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |   12 ++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index a23ca75..41cccd4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1481,13 +1481,16 @@ static int mmu_zap_unsync_children(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
>  
>  		for_each_sp(pages, sp, parents, i) {
> +			if (list_empty(&kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages))
> +				goto exit;

I meant to check for list_empty in kvm_mmu_change_mmu_pages, instead of
relying on the count returned by kvm_mmu_zap_page. Similarly to what 
__kvm_mmu_free_some_pages does.

Checking here is not needed because the pages returned in the array 
will not be zapped (mmu_lock is held).

Applied 1, 4 and 5 (so please regenerate against kvm.git -next branch),
thanks.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/